Bart Ehrman on Literacy in the First Century

Several significant studies of literacy have appeared in recent years showing just how low literacy rates were in antiquity. The most frequently cited study is by Columbia professor William Harris in a book titled Ancient Literacy.  By thoroughly examining all the surviving evidence, Harris draws the compelling though surprising conclusion that in the very best of times in the ancient world, only about 10 percent of the population could read at all and possibly copy out writing on a page. Far fewer than this, of course, could compose a sentence, let alone a story, let alone an entire book. And who were the people in this 10 percent? They were the upper-class elite who had the time, money, and leisure to afford an education. This is not an apt description of Jesus’s disciples. They were not upper-crust aristocrats.

In Roman Palestine the situation was even bleaker. The most thorough examination of literacy in Palestine is by a professor of Jewish studies at the University of London, Catherine Hezser, who shows that in the days of Jesus probably only 3 percent of Jews in Palestine were literate. Once again, these would be the people who could read and maybe write their names and copy words. Far fewer could compose sentences, paragraphs, chapters, and books. And once again, these would have been the urban elites.

Source:  Ehrman, Bart D. (2012-03-20). Did Jesus Exist?: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth (Kindle Locations 702-712). Harper Collins, Inc.. Kindle Edition.

If literacy rates were this low, we should have expected the initial movement of Jesus followers to have been largely an oral movement.  And, indeed, that’s just what the extant first-century Christian documents would lead us to believe.

There is a broad scholarly consensus – spanning the liberal-conservative spectrum – that we have seven letters of Paul that everyone can count on as genuinely his, and that they were written from 50 to 60 A.D.  When we read these documents today we recognize that they imply a great deal of information about Jesus that had already been exchanged orally, all around the eastern and northern Mediterranean Basin.

Think of it: 15-20 years of history without a written record.  Yet there is no hint of misunderstanding about the main points of the information about Jesus that had been exchanged.  See most notably 1 Corinthians 15:3-7.

This entry was posted in Literacy & Orality. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Bart Ehrman on Literacy in the First Century

  1. Pingback: How conservative is too conservative? - Page 3 - Christian Forums

  2. Pingback: The Cult of Indoctrination (and How About the Kids?): Part Two | Remedy of Fanaticism

Comments are closed.