Dying for Belief: An analysis of a confused objection to one of the evidences for the resurrection by J.W. Wartick

Excerpts:

There is an objection to one of the evidences for the resurrection which is, frankly, terribly confused. I most recently ran into it on the discussion page for the radio show Unbelievable? Essentially, the objection goes like this: Christians say the fact that the disciples died for what they believe is evidence for its truth, but all kinds of religious people die for what they believe; are they all true?

The objector then often proceeds to note that some Muslims will die in suicide bombings due to their beliefs; they will note events like Thich Quang Duc burning himself to protest persecution; they will note other events in which religious people die for their beliefs. The implication, it is alleged, is that this cannot count for evidence for the truth of what they belief. People die for false things all the time; it doesn’t make what they believe true.

via Dying for Belief: An analysis of a confused objection to one of the evidences for the resurrection | J.W. Wartick -“Always Have a Reason”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.